Search This Blog

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Bad news for tiger conservation Vijay Pinjarkar, TNN

Nagpur: In a setback to process of creating inviolate spaces for highly endangered tigers, the ministry of environment and forests (MoEF) has withdrawn the revised guidelines for determination of critical wildlife habitats (CWHs) thus stalling the entire process.


The MoEF on February 7 had circulated the revised guidelines about determination of CWH. However, members of some NGOs made representations to the ministry against some of the points in it. The organizations were of the view that the relocation of people from CWH needed to be fine-tuned to be compliant with provisions of Forest Rights Act 2006. Taking note of the concerns at a meeting held in Delhi on March 4, the guidelines were withdrawn. "Process to issue fresh guidelines has been initiated," NTCA officials said.


CWH are areas of national parks and sanctuaries that are required to be kept inviolate for the purposes of wildlife conservation as determined and notified by the MoEF, after open process of consultations by an expert committee. After notifying critical tiger habitats (CTHs) three years ago, the state initiated process to declare CWHs. A minimum inviolate space of 800-1000 sq km should be maintained to support a viable population of tigers in tiger landscapes, based on tiger parameters, territory sizes and populations viability analysis.


In Maharashtra, a state-level committee headed by chief wildlife warden has already given a go-ahead to 19 national parks and sanctuaries to complete consultations with stakeholders. In August last, to speed up the process of relocation of villages in CWHs, subcommittees with respective chief conservators (CCFs) and deputy conservators (DyCFs) were also constituted. These officials had initiated consultation process and even completed them in Navegaon National Park and Tipeshwar Wildlife Sanctuary.


V K Mohan, chief conservator of forests (CCF) for wildlife administration, said the process would now be stalled until fresh guidelines were issued. Dilip Gode of the Vidarbha Nature Conservation Society (VNCS), who was part of the MoEF meeting on March 4, said: "We want the consultations to be held properly with involvement of all stakeholders. Entire process should be video recorded and there should be scope for scientific avenues. Not all CWH are needed to be declared inviolate."


Conservationists decried move. Already, there are many villages in tiger reserves that are needed to be relocated. Villagers living in parks and reserves are also keen to move out. The delay will further escalate cost of relocation and tigers, that are crying for space, will also have to wait, they said.


BOX


CWH process stalled?


* The first guidelines for CWH were issued on October 25, 2007. On February 7, 2011, MoEF issued revised ones. These too have been withdrawn on March 4, 2011


* CWHs can be declared only with voluntary consent of affected people. It involves secure livelihoods to persons to be relocated


* A state-level committee has given go-ahead to 19 national parks and sanctuaries in Maharashtra to complete consultations with stakeholders for CWH. Consultations in Navegaon and Tipeshwar have been completed. Of the remaining 17 parks, most of them are in second stage of consultation.


http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/nagpur/Bad-news-for-tiger-conservation/articleshow/7666523.cms

No comments:

Post a Comment