Search This Blog

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Corrupt cops implicate activist as abettor in Goa Tiger Killing case

Panaji: The investigation into the last year's tiger killing in the state, has named state’s renowned environmentalist Rajendra Kerkar as abettor in the crime as he (Kerkar) did not reveal the source of information.

The investigation document mentions that Kerkar, who initially exposed the case through a newspaper, did not reveal the source of information and claimed it as a "secret source."

The State government has got the formal confirmation about the tiger killing from the Dehradun-based Wildlife Institute of India (WII). It has confirmed that the animal killed in the forest of Keri village, 60 kms away from here, was a tiger. The tiger poaching case was brought to light by Kerkar through his writing in the newspaper and had carried the picture of an animal carcass lying between two boulders.
"He had to be made abettor as he was not cooperating with the officers. Initially for almost one-and-half-months, we were scouting through vast jungle to get a clue based on the photograph carried in the newspaper," a senior Forest officer said. The tiger was killed in last week of February last year, the incident was reported in April.
The Forest Department has said that they had made Kerkar as abettor as they wanted to confirm the computer in which the picture of tiger was downloaded. "Kerkar also claimed that the tiger was seen in the area for last two years and it had killed the cattle. We wanted to see whether there were any report of cattle killed during the period," the officer stated.

Forest Department has already zeroed on two accused belonging to Majik community who allegedly shot the wounded tiger who had got entangled in the wire snares. When questioned Chief Conservator of Forest Shashi Kumar said that he would not like to comment on Kerkar being made abettor as 'case is being investigated.’

Kerkar said today that the Forest Department’s action was expected. "The department is more interested in covering up the incident," he alleged.

He said that as a journalist, he had carried the picture in the newspaper and had not told about the origin of picture so as to protect the source.

No comments:

Post a Comment